Tuesday, December 2, 2008
I was motivated today to take a look at the paper and I saw that GM is asking for $18 BILLION to prevent its collapse. I feel like one day I'm going to look outside my window and the world will be in ruins, having crumbled while I was inside intensely focused on reading the "great books" or writing that paper.
Also watched this disturbing video today: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NA98U0Csers
I just can't believe that this kind of thing goes on, it acceptable among men, and nothing is done about it. It's disgusting, how can they call themselves human?
But then, what is human? And who gets to decide what's right? Are there fundamental rights and wrongs and if so how come some people just don't see them as so? Are we allowed to go into another country and tell them what to do? Where is the line? When do we need to step in?
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Monsters in Video Games
I touched briefly on the topic of monsters in video games during my group presentation with Sheldon and Ridwan, but never actually thought to pull back from the Dracula monster and look at the horde of video game monsters and how they relate to each of Cohen's theses. The discussion on Monday caused me to return to "Monster Culture" and search for which theses related to the various video game monsters I could think of. Immediately I could relate "Thesis II: The Monster Always Escapes" and "Thesis III: The Monster is the Harbinger of Category Crisis" to the Flood from Halo, "Thesis VII: The Monster Stands at the Threshold... of Becoming" to Lord Vayne of Final Fantasy XII, and "Thesis VI: Fear of the Monster is Really a Kind of Desire" to Riku's relationship with the Heartless of Kingdom Hearts, just to name a few.
I guess my question to you is what other video game villains or monsters have you encountered and how do they relate to Cohen's theses? And, if you are not as intense of a gamer as I am (and I would hope not for the safety of your social life) what monsters in current television, particularly cartoons (I would name a few in that category but I do not want to take them away from you), do you see and how do those relate to Cohen's theses? The major requirement I want to place though, is that these monster not be historically prevalent monsters, but newly established monsters. I know this moves away from Cohen's monster which is historically grounded, but that is my objective.
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Women With Opinions Should Stay in the Attic
Sunday, November 9, 2008
Monsters on the Campaign Trail
As I read Cohen’s essay on Monster Culture, I was very interested in how Cohen successfully delineates a number of notable events in history and describes a monster of that time period. After seeing his examples of monsters throughout history and reflecting back on the sample essays use of the terrorist as a monster, it seems undeniable that monsters play a key role in society.
Looking back on the last few days of the election and its exciting conclusion, I began to wonder if there was a monster to be found in this historic time in our nation. My mind automatically drifted back to the controversial cover of the New Yorker. I remember the time surrounding that publication, on in which all the misconceptions that Obama is a Muslim seemed true and legitimate. I also linked it to the fact that days before the election, 60% of Texans were under the impression that Obama was a Muslim. In the end it didn’t prevent him from winning, but it did help spur these misconceptions.
As for a solid monster figure, I couldn’t really come up with one. Though the campaign was lengthy and filled with epithets and recurring characters like Joe Six Pack and Joe the Plumber that were meant to represent the average American, I couldn’t find one figure that constituted a monster the way Cohen describes it. One thing that did strike me was the significance and large role that terrorism continues to play. National security was still a top issue in this election and the candidates did use vague phrases like “take them out” to calm the nations fears on a national security strike.
My question for you then is: Is the monster of the Terrorist still alive in our society today as it was eight years ago? Were there any monsters that played a major part in this election? How do monsters shape elections and outcomes? Finally, how do covers like the New Yorker help legitimize monsters, misconceptions, and ignorance?
The Monster in American Culture
"One day the apolitical intellectuals of my country will be interrogated by the simplest of our people. They will be asked what they did when their nation died out slowly, like a sweet fire, small and alone....On that day the simple men will come...and they'll ask: "What did you do when the poor suffered, when tenderness and life burned out in them" Apolitical intellectuals of my sweet country, you will not be able to answer. A vulture of silence will eat your gut. Your own misery will pick at your soul. And you will be mute...in your shame."
I bring this poem up because we are amidst a cultural pandemic that has not culminated but begun with our economic crisis. I also bring this poem up because I found it relevant to the political drama of recent weeks and also because I found it personally inspiring.
This past week, I had the opportunity of touring the United Nations with my fellow Columbia students. We had the privilege of attending a forum where many high-ranking officials of the UN spoke. One particular man who worked for the high commissioner for human rights was particularly memorable. He fervently believed in the idea that human rights should be placed above all and was saddened by how many countries, including the United States have made excuses and abused the universally agreed rights of every human being. He received questions from concerned students from China, Afghanistan and Myanmar. What struck me was how the United States was viewed and alluded to. The speakers, on numerous occasions, referred to how they hope the 'new administration' would be better in dealing with human rights issues.
It almost seemed like to me that the United States was viewed as a sort of 'monster' by many outsiders. It seems like our culture has become this monster that we fear ourselves, but we cannot escape from it because we also desire it. Sarah in her previous post talked about harmonizing the American mindset, and Andrew talked about how we must use cultural evolution to solve our problems-- how can we find a way to change our way of thinking and our way of life?
Yet there is hope-- I mentioned the poem because I felt it speaks to what I believe in. During the UN tour, the guide also mentioned something that I found inspiring. He mentioned this food called 'plumpy-nut' (you can wiki it) that is used by UNICEF. This food is a sort of paste that contains lots of nutrients, is easy to eat and easy to digest. A french scientist developed this in 1999 and it has shown to be very effective, especially with starving children. This is the kind of work scientists should be doing. Has nobody in the last 9 years been able to develop something better? Researchers can change the issue of world hunger but instead many doctors spend their time getting rich on cosmetics, liposuction and breast implants. How can we change our mindset to focus on things that matter? Before it's too late?
Do you feel that American culture is a type of monster in itself? Is it not a monster that continues to spread across the world? How can we stop it? How can we reverse it? Cohen's monster is one that is indestructible. Is our monster any different?